Guidance for
Protecting Building Environments
from Airborne
Chemical, Biological, or Radiological Attacks
|
|
|
SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
|
Ventilation and
Filtration
|
HVAC
systems and their components should be evaluated with respect to how
they impact vulnerability to the introduction of CBR agents. Relevant
issues include the HVAC system controls, the ability of the HVAC
system to purge the building, the efficiency of installed filters, the
capacity of the system relative to potential filter upgrades, and the
significance of uncontrolled leakage into the building. Another
consideration is the vulnerability of the HVAC system and components
themselves, particularly when the facility is open to the public. For
buildings under secure access, interior components may be considered
less vulnerable, depending upon the perceived threat and the
confidence in the level of security. |
|
***1.
|
EVALUATE
HVAC CONTROL OPTIONS. Many central HVAC systems have energy management
and control systems that can regulate airflow and pressures within a
building on an emergency response basis. Some modern fire alarm systems
may also provide useful capabilities during CBR events. In some cases,
the best response option (given sufficient warning) might be to shut off
the building’s HVAC and exhaust system( s), thus, avoiding the
introduction of a CBR agent from outside. In other cases, interior
pressure and airflow control may prevent the spread of a CBR agent
released in the building and/or ensure the safety of egress pathways.
The decision to install emergency HVAC control options should be made in
consultation with a qualified HVAC professional that understands the
ramifications of various HVAC operating modes on building operation and
safety systems.
Depending
upon the design and operation of the HVAC system and the nature of the
CBR agent release, HVAC control may not be appropriate in all emergency
situations. Lobbies, loading docks, and mailrooms might be provided with
manually operated exhaust systems, activated by trained personnel to
remove contaminants in the event of a known release, exhausting air to
an appropriate area. In other instances, manipulation of the HVAC system
could minimize the spread of an agent. If an HVAC control plan is
pursued, building personnel should be trained to recognize a terrorist
attack quickly and to know when to initiate the control measures. For
example, emergency egress stairwells should remain pressurized (unless
they are known to contain the CBR source). Other areas, such as
laboratories, clean rooms, or pressure isolation rooms in hospitals, may
need to remain ventilated. All procedures and training associated with
the control of the HVAC system should be addressed in the building’s
emergency response plan.
|
|
***2.
|
ASSESS
FILTRATION. Increasing filter efficiency is one of the few measures that
can be implemented in advance to reduce the consequences of both an
interior and exterior release of a particulate CBR agent. However, the
decision to increase efficiency should be made cautiously, with a
careful understanding of the protective limitations resulting from the
upgrade. The filtration needs of a building should be assessed with a
view to implementing the highest filtration efficiency that is
compatible with the installed HVAC system and its required operating
parameters. In general, increased filter efficiency will provide
benefits to the indoor environmental quality of the building. However,
the increased protection from CBR aerosols will occur only if the
filtration efficiency increase applies to the particle size range and
physical state of the CBR contaminant. It is important to note that
particulate air filters are used for biological and radiological
particles and are not effective for gases and vapors typical of chemical
attacks. These types of compounds require adsorbent filters (i.e.,
activated carbon or other sorbent-type media) and result in substantial
initial and recurring costs.
Upgrading
filtration is not as simple as merely replacing a low-efficiency filter
with a higher efficiency one. Typically, higher efficiency filters have
a higher pressure loss, which will result in some airflow reduction
through the system. The magnitude of the reduction is dependent on the
design and capacity of the HVAC system. If the airflow reduction is
substantial, it may result in inadequate ventilation, reductions in
heating and cooling capacity, or potentially frozen coils. To minimize
pressure loss, deep pleated filters or filter banks having a larger
nominal inlet area might be feasible alternatives, if space allows.
Also, high-pressure losses can sometimes be avoided by using prefilters
or more frequent filter changeouts. Pressure loss associated with
adsorbent filters can be even greater.
The
integrity of the HVAC system’s filter rack or frame system has a major
impact upon the installed filtration efficiency. Reducing the leakage of
unfiltered air around filters, caused by a poor seal between the filter
and the frame, may be as important as increasing filter efficiency. If
filter bypass proves to be significant, corrective actions will be
needed. Some highefficiency filter systems have better seals and frames
constructed to reduce bypass. During an upgrade to higher efficiency
filters, the HVAC and filtration systems should be evaluated by a
qualified HVAC professional to verify proper performance.
While
higher filtration efficiency is encouraged and should provide indoor air
quality benefits beyond an increased protection from CBR terrorist
events, the overall cost of filtration should be evaluated. Filtration
costs include the periodic cost of the filter media, the labor cost to
remove and replace filters, and the fan energy cost required to overcome
the pressure loss of the filters. While higher efficiency filters tend
to have a higher life cycle cost than lower efficiency filters, this is
not always the case. With some higher efficiency filter systems, higher
acquisition and energy costs can be offset by longer filter life and a
reduced labor cost for filter replacements. Also, improved filtration
generally keeps heating and cooling coils cleaner and, thus, may reduce
energy costs through improvements in heat transfer efficiency. However,
when high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and/or activated
carbon adsorbers are used, the overall costs will generally increase
substantially.
|
|
3. |
DUCTED AND
NON-DUCTED RETURN AIR SYSTEMS. Ducted returns offer limited access
points to introduce a CBR agent. The return vents can be placed in
conspicuous locations, reducing the risk of an agent being secretly
introduced into the return system. Non-ducted return air systems
commonly use hallways or spaces above dropped ceilings as a return-air
path or plenum. CBR agents introduced at any location above the dropped
ceiling in a ceiling plenum return system will most likely migrate back
to the HVAC unit and, without highly efficient filtration for the
particular agent, redistribute to occupied areas. Buildings should be
designed to minimize mixing between air-handling zones, which can be
partially accomplished by limiting shared returns. Where ducted returns
are not feasible or warranted, hold-down clips may be used for
accessible areas of dropped ceilings that serve as the return plenum.
This issue is closely related to the isolation of lobbies and mailrooms,
as shared returns are a common way for contaminants from these areas to
disperse into the rest of the building. These modifications may be more
feasible for new building construction or those undergoing major
renovation.
|
|
4. |
LOW-LEAKAGE, FAST-ACTING DAMPERS. Rapid response, such as shutting down
an HVAC system, may also involve closing various dampers, especially
those controlling the flow of outdoor air (in the event of an exterior
CBR release). When the HVAC system is turned off, the building pressure
compared to outdoors may still be negative, drawing outdoor air into the
building via many leakage pathways, including the HVAC system.
Consideration should be given to installing low leakage dampers to
minimize this flow pathway. Damper leakage ratings are available as part
of the manufacturer’s specifications and range from ultra-low to normal
categories. Assuming that you have some warning prior to a direct CBR
release, the speed with which these dampers respond to a "close"
instruction can also be important. From a protective standpoint, dampers
that respond quickly are preferred over dampers that might take 30
seconds or more to respond.
|
|
5. |
BUILDING
AIR TIGHTNESS. Significant quantities of air can enter a building by
means of infiltration through unintentional leakage paths in the
building envelope. Such leakage is of more concern for an exterior CBR
release at some distance from a building, such as a large-scale attack,
than for a directed terrorist act. The reduction of air leakage is a
matter of tight building construction in combination with building
pressurization. While building pressurization may be a valuable CBR-protection
strategy in any building, it is much more likely to be effective in a
tight building. However, to be effective, filtration of building supply
air must be appropriate for the CBR agent introduced. Although
increasing the air tightness of an existing building can be more
challenging than during new construction, it should still be seriously
considered.
|
|
Maintenance, Administration, and Training
Maintenance of ventilation systems and training of staff are critical
for controlling exposure to airborne contaminants, such as CBR agents.
|
***1.
|
EMERGENCY
PLANS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES. All buildings should have current
emergency plans to address fire, weather, and other types of
emergencies. In light of past U.S. experiences with anthrax and similar
threats, these plans should be updated to consider CBR attack scenarios
and the associated procedures for communicating instructions to building
occupants, identifying suitable shelter-in-place areas (if they exist),
identifying appropriate use and selection of personal protective
equipment (i.e., clothing, gloves, respirators) and directing emergency
evacuations. Individuals developing emergency plans and procedures
should recognize that there are fundamental differences between
chemical, biological, and radiological agents. In general, chemical
agents will show a rapid onset of symptoms, while the response to
biological and radiological agents will be delayed.* Issues such as
designated areas and procedures for chemical storage, HVAC control or
shutdown, and communication with building occupants and emergency
responders, should all be addressed. The plans should be as
comprehensive as possible, but, as described earlier, protected by
limited and controlled access. When appropriately designed, these plans,
policies, and procedures can have a major impact upon occupant
survivability in the event of a CBR release. Staff training,
particularly for those with specific responsibilities during an event,
is essential and should cover both internal and external events. Holding
regularly scheduled practice drills, similar to the common fire drill,
allows for plan testing, as well as occupant and key staff rehearsal of
the plan, and increases the likelihood for success in an actual event.
For protection systems in which HVAC control is done via the energy
management and control system, emergency procedures should be exercised
periodically to ascertain that the various control options work (and
continue to work) as planned.
*Note:
Additional information on CBR agents may be found via the references at
the end of this document.
|
|
***2.
|
HVAC
MAINTENANCE STAFF TRAINING. Periodic training of HVAC maintenance staff
in system operation and maintenance should be conducted. This training
should include the procedures to be followed in the event of a suspected
CBR agent release. Training should also cover health and safety aspects
for maintenance personnel, as well as the potential health consequences
to occupants of poorly performing systems. Development of current,
accurate HVAC diagrams and HVAC system labeling protocols should be
addressed. These documents can be of great value in the event of a CBR
release.
|
|
***3. |
PREVENTIVE
MAINTENANCE AND PROCEDURES. Procedures and preventive maintenance
schedules should be implemented for cleaning and maintaining ventilation
system components. Replacement filters, parts, and so forth should be
obtained from known manufacturers and examined prior to installation. It
is important that ventilation systems be maintained and cleaned
according to the manufacturer's specifications. To do this requires
information on HVAC system performance, flow rates, damper modulation
and closure, sensor calibration, filter pressure loss, filter leakage,
and filter change-out recommendations. These steps are critical to
ensure that protection and mitigation systems, such as particulate
filtration, operate as intended.
|
|
Reducing a
building's vulnerability to an airborne chemical, biological, or
radiological attack requires a comprehensive approach. Decisions
concerning which protective measures to implement should be based upon the
threat profile and a security assessment of the building and its
occupants. While physical security is the first layer of defense, other
issues must also be addressed. Preventing possible terrorist access to
outdoor air intakes and mechanical rooms and developing CBR-contingent
emergency response plans should be addressed as soon as possible.
Additional measures can provide further protection. A building security
assessment should be done to determine the necessity of additional
measures. Some items, such as improved maintenance and HVAC system
controls, may also provide a payback in operating costs and/or improved
building air quality. As new building designs or modifications are
considered, designers should consider that practical CBR sensors may soon
become available. Building system design features that are capable of
incorporating this rapidly evolving technology will most likely offer a
greater level of protection.
While it is
not possible to completely eliminate the risk of a CBR terrorist attack,
several measures can be taken to reduce the likelihood and consequences of
such an attack. Many of the recommendations presented here are ones that
can be implemented reasonably quickly and cost effectively. Many are
applicable to both new construction and existing buildings, although some
may be more feasible than others. Building owners and managers should
assess buildings by looking first for those items that are most vulnerable
and can be addressed easily. Additional measures should be implemented as
feasible. The goals are to make your building an unattractive target for a
CBR attack and to maximize occupant protection in the event that such an
attack occurs.
|
|
|